Re: [PATCH] zram: remove global tb_lock by using lock-free CAS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 11:52:59PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> >> Most popular use of zram is the in-memory swap for small embedded system
> >> so I don't want to increase memory footprint without good reason although
> >> it makes synthetic benchmark. Alhought it's 1M for 1G, it isn't small if we
> >> consider compression ratio and real free memory after boot
> 
> We can use bit spin lock and this would not increase memory footprint for 32 bit
> platform.

Sounds like a idea.
Weijie, Do you mind testing with bit spin lock?

> 
> Thanks.
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]