On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 09:44:48AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> +/*
> + * If PageWaiters was found to be set at unlock time, __wake_page_waiters
> + * should be called to actually perform the wakeup of waiters.
> + */
> +static inline void __wake_page_waiters(struct page *page)
> +{
> + ClearPageWaiters(page);
-ENOCOMMENT
barriers should always come with a comment that explain the memory
ordering and reference the pairing barrier.
Also, FWIW, there's a mass rename queued for .16 that'll make this:
smp_mb__after_atomic();
but for now it will also still provide the old names with a __deprecated
tag on, so no real harm.
> + smp_mb__after_clear_bit();
> + wake_up_page(page, PG_locked);
> +}
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>