Re: [PATCH 14/17] mm: Do not use atomic operations when releasing pages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 09:29:22AM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 09:44:45AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > There should be no references to it any more and a parallel mark should
> > not be reordered against us. Use non-locked varient to clear page active.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  mm/swap.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
> > index f2228b7..7a5bdd7 100644
> > --- a/mm/swap.c
> > +++ b/mm/swap.c
> > @@ -854,7 +854,7 @@ void release_pages(struct page **pages, int nr, bool cold)
> >  		}
> >  
> >  		/* Clear Active bit in case of parallel mark_page_accessed */
> > -		ClearPageActive(page);
> > +		__ClearPageActive(page);
> 
> Shouldn't this comment be removed also?

Why? We're still clearing the active bit.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]