On 04/29/2014 06:39 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:19:10 -0400 Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> It is possible for "limit - setpoint + 1" to equal zero, leading to a
>> divide by zero error. Blindly adding 1 to "limit - setpoint" is not
>> working, so we need to actually test the divisor before calling div64.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> --- a/mm/page-writeback.c
>> +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
>> @@ -597,11 +597,16 @@ static inline long long pos_ratio_polynom(unsigned long setpoint,
>> unsigned long dirty,
>> unsigned long limit)
>> {
>> + unsigned int divisor;
>
> I'm thinking this would be better as a ulong so I don't have to worry
> my pretty head over truncation things?
I looked at div_*64, and the second argument is a 32 bit
variable. I guess a long would be ok, since if we are
dividing by more than 4 billion we don't really care :)
static inline s64 div_s64(s64 dividend, s32 divisor)
> --- a/mm/page-writeback.c~mm-page-writebackc-fix-divide-by-zero-in-pos_ratio_polynom-fix
> +++ a/mm/page-writeback.c
> @@ -597,13 +597,13 @@ static inline long long pos_ratio_polyno
> unsigned long dirty,
> unsigned long limit)
> {
> - unsigned int divisor;
> + unsigned long divisor;
> long long pos_ratio;
> long x;
>
> divisor = limit - setpoint;
> if (!divisor)
> - divisor = 1;
> + divisor = 1; /* Avoid div-by-zero */
Works for me :)
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>