Re: [BUG] kernel BUG at mm/vmacache.c:85!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/29/2014 03:55 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> I think that returning some stale/bogus vma is causing those segfaults
>> in udev. It shouldn't occur in a normal scenario. What puzzles me is
>> that it's not always reproducible. This makes me wonder what else is
>> going on...
> 
> I've replaced the BUG_ON() with a WARN_ON_ONCE(), and made it be
> unconditional (so you don't have to trigger the range check).
> 
> That might make it show up earlier and easier (and hopefully closer to
> the place that causes it). Maybe that makes it easier for Srivatsa to
> reproduce this. It doesn't make *my* machine do anything different,
> though.
> 
> Srivatsa? It's in current -git.
> 

I tried this, but still nothing so far. I rebooted 10-20 times, and also
tried multiple runs of multi-threaded ebizzy and kernel compilations,
but none of this hit the warning.

Is there anything more specific I can run to increase the chances of
hitting this? I guess a test-case might be too much to ask since I'm
the first one hitting this, but if anybody has suggestions of scenarios
which have a higher likelihood of hitting this (like running multi-
threaded workloads or whatever), I could probably give it a try as well.

Thank you!

Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]