Re: [BUG] kernel BUG at mm/vmacache.c:85!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/29/2014 03:25 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> That said, the bug does seem to be that some path doesn't invalidate
>> the vmacache sufficiently, or something inserts a vmacache entry into
>> the current process when looking up a remote process or whatever.
>> Davidlohr, ideas?
> 
> Maybe we missed some use_mm() call. That will change the current mm
> without flushing the vma cache. The code considers kernel threads to
> be bad targets for vma caching for this reason (and perhaps others),
> but maybe we missed something.
> 
> I wonder if we should just invalidate the vma cache in use_mm(), and
> remote the "kernel tasks are special" check.
> 
> Srivatsa, are you doing something peculiar on that system that would
> trigger this? I see some kdump failures in the log, anything else?
> 

No, it was just plain booting. The machine is simply configured with
kdump, that's all. I'm surprised that so many processes got segfaults
during boot. Looks like an mm bug in the kernel.

Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]