[Full introduction right after the changelog]
Changelog
---------
v3
- Dropped unnecessary WARN_ON() call [Kirill]
- Always check if the pfn range lies within a zone [Yasuaki]
- Renamed some function arguments for consistency
v2
- Rewrote allocation loop to avoid scanning unless PFNs [Yasuaki]
- Dropped incomplete multi-arch support [Naoya]
- Added patch to drop __init from prep_compound_gigantic_page()
- Restricted the feature to x86_64 (more details in patch 5/5)
- Added review-bys plus minor changelog changes
Introduction
------------
The HugeTLB subsystem uses the buddy allocator to allocate hugepages during
runtime. This means that hugepages allocation during runtime is limited to
MAX_ORDER order. For archs supporting gigantic pages (that is, page sizes
greater than MAX_ORDER), this in turn means that those pages can't be
allocated at runtime.
HugeTLB supports gigantic page allocation during boottime, via the boot
allocator. To this end the kernel provides the command-line options
hugepagesz= and hugepages=, which can be used to instruct the kernel to
allocate N gigantic pages during boot.
For example, x86_64 supports 2M and 1G hugepages, but only 2M hugepages can
be allocated and freed at runtime. If one wants to allocate 1G gigantic pages,
this has to be done at boot via the hugepagesz= and hugepages= command-line
options.
Now, gigantic page allocation at boottime has two serious problems:
1. Boottime allocation is not NUMA aware. On a NUMA machine the kernel
evenly distributes boottime allocated hugepages among nodes.
For example, suppose you have a four-node NUMA machine and want
to allocate four 1G gigantic pages at boottime. The kernel will
allocate one gigantic page per node.
On the other hand, we do have users who want to be able to specify
which NUMA node gigantic pages should allocated from. So that they
can place virtual machines on a specific NUMA node.
2. Gigantic pages allocated at boottime can't be freed
At this point it's important to observe that regular hugepages allocated
at runtime don't have those problems. This is so because HugeTLB interface
for runtime allocation in sysfs supports NUMA and runtime allocated pages
can be freed just fine via the buddy allocator.
This series adds support for allocating gigantic pages at runtime. It does
so by allocating gigantic pages via CMA instead of the buddy allocator.
Releasing gigantic pages is also supported via CMA. As this series builds
on top of the existing HugeTLB interface, it makes gigantic page allocation
and releasing just like regular sized hugepages. This also means that NUMA
support just works.
For example, to allocate two 1G gigantic pages on node 1, one can do:
# echo 2 > \
/sys/devices/system/node/node1/hugepages/hugepages-1048576kB/nr_hugepages
And, to release all gigantic pages on the same node:
# echo 0 > \
/sys/devices/system/node/node1/hugepages/hugepages-1048576kB/nr_hugepages
Please, refer to patch 5/5 for full technical details.
Finally, please note that this series is a follow up for a previous series
that tried to extend the command-line options set to be NUMA aware:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=139593335312191&w=2
During the discussion of that series it was agreed that having runtime
allocation support for gigantic pages was a better solution.
Luiz Capitulino (5):
hugetlb: prep_compound_gigantic_page(): drop __init marker
hugetlb: add hstate_is_gigantic()
hugetlb: update_and_free_page(): don't clear PG_reserved bit
hugetlb: move helpers up in the file
hugetlb: add support for gigantic page allocation at runtime
include/linux/hugetlb.h | 5 +
mm/hugetlb.c | 336 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
2 files changed, 245 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-)
--
1.8.1.4
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>