On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 15:31 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 04/03/2014 02:44 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > > Now, on a more general scenario, I basically would like to know, 1) is > > this actually useful... I'm hoping that, if in fact something like this > > gets merged, it won't just sit there. 2) What other general data would > > be useful for debugging purposes? I'm happy to collect feedback and send > > out something we can all benefit from. > > One thing that would be nice, specifically for the VM, would be to turn > all of the things that touch the /proc/vmstat counters > (count_vm_event(), etc...) in to tracepoints. Hmm what would be the difference? what's the issue with /proc/vmstat? I guess for one, some of the stats depend on build rules (ie TLB flushing statistics). -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>