Hi, On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 04:10 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 02:25:45PM -0400, Richard Hansen wrote: > > For the flags parameter, POSIX says "Either MS_ASYNC or MS_SYNC shall > > be specified, but not both." [1] There was already a test for the > > "both" condition. Add a test to ensure that the caller specified one > > of the flags; fail with EINVAL if neither are specified. > > This breaks various (sloppy) existing userspace for no gain. > > NAK. > Agreed. It might be better to have something like: if (flags == 0) flags = MS_SYNC; That way applications which don't set the flags (and possibly also don't check the return value, so will not notice an error return) will get the sync they desire. Not that either of those things is desirable, but at least we can make the best of the situation. Probably better to be slow than to potentially lose someone's data in this case, Steve. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>