On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 02:22:06PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On 03/21/2014 02:35 PM, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >Based on the issues reported by Tang and Gu, I've come up with the an
> >alternative fix that avoids adding additional locking in the event read
> >code path. The fix is to take the ring_lock mutex during page migration,
> >which is already used to syncronize event readers and thus does not add
> >any new locking requirements in aio_read_events_ring(). I've dropped
> >the patches from Tang and Gu as a result. This patch is now in my
> >git://git.kvack.org/~bcrl/aio-next.git tree and will be sent to Linus
> >once a few other people chime in with their reviews of this change.
> >Please review Tang, Gu. Thanks!
>
> Hi Benjamin,
>
> This patch seems to trigger:
>
> [ 433.476216] ======================================================
> [ 433.478468] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
...
Yeah, that's a problem -- thanks for the report. The ring_lock mutex can't
be nested inside of mmap_sem, as aio_read_events_ring() can take a page
fault while holding ring_mutex. That makes the following change required.
I'll fold this change into the patch that caused this issue.
-ben
--
"Thought is the essence of where you are now."
diff --git a/fs/aio.c b/fs/aio.c
index c97cee8..f645e7e 100644
--- a/fs/aio.c
+++ b/fs/aio.c
@@ -300,7 +300,10 @@ static int aio_migratepage(struct address_space *mapping, struct page *new,
if (!ctx)
return -EINVAL;
- mutex_lock(&ctx->ring_lock);
+ if (!mutex_trylock(&ctx->ring_lock)) {
+ percpu_ref_put(&ctx->users);
+ return -EAGAIN;
+ }
/* Make sure the old page hasn't already been changed */
spin_lock(&mapping->private_lock);
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>