On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 05:44:10PM -0400, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 11:23:32AM -0700, Zach Brown wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 09:30:41PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > This RFC provides a rough implementation of a mechanism to allow
> > > userspace to attach protection information (e.g. T10 DIF) data to a
> > > disk write and to receive the information alongside a disk read. The
> > > interface is an extension to the AIO interface: two new commands
> > > (IOCB_CMD_P{READ,WRITE}VM) are provided. The last struct iovec in the
> > > arg list is interpreted to point to a buffer containing a header,
> > > followed by the the PI data.
> >
> > Instead of adding commands that indicate that the final element is a
> > magical pi buffer, why not expand the iocb?
> >
> > In the user iocb, a bit in aio_flags could indicate that aio_reserved2
> > is a pointer to an extension of the iocb. In that extension could be a
> > full iov *, nr_segs for PI data.
>
> I'm inclined to agree with Zach on this item. Ultimately, we need an
> extensible data structure that can be grown without completely revising
> the ABI as new parameters are added. We need something that is either
> TLV based, or an extensible array.
Ok. Let's define IOCB_FLAG_EXTENSIONS as an iocb.aio_flags flag to indicate
that this struct iocb has extensions attached to it. Then, iocb.aio_reserved2
becomes a pointer to an array of extension descriptors, and iocb.aio_reqprio
becomes a u16 that tells us the array length. The libaio.h equivalents are
iocb.u.c.flags, iocb.u.c.__pad3, and iocb.aio_reqprio, respectively.
Next, let's define a conceptual structure for aio extensions:
struct iocb_extension {
void *ie_buf;
unsigned int ie_buflen;
unsigned int ie_type;
unsigned int ie_flags;
};
The actual definitions can be defined in a similar fashion to the other aio
structures so that the structures are padded to the same layout regardless of
bitness. As mentioned above, iocb.aio_reserved2 points to an array of these.
Question: Do we want to allow ie_buf to be struct iovec[]? Can we leave that
to the extension designer to decide if they want to support either a S-G list,
one big (vaddr) buffer, or toggle flags?
For the PI passthrough, I'll define IOCB_EXT_PI as the first ie_type, and move
the flags argument out of the PI buffer and into ie_flags.
I could also make an IOCB_EXT_REQPRIO where ie_flags = reqprio, but since the
kernel ignores it right now, I don't see much point.
> > You'd then translate that into a bigger kernel kiocb with a specific
> > pointer to PI data rather than having to bubble the tests for this magic
> > final iovec down through the kernel.
> >
> > + if (iocb->ki_flags & KIOCB_USE_PI) {
> > + nr_segs--;
> > + pi_iov = (struct iovec *)(iov + nr_segs);
> > + }
> >
> > I suggest this because there's already pressure to extend the iocb.
> > Folks want io priority inputs, completion time outputs, etc.
>
> There are already folks at other companies looking at similar extensions.
> I think there are folks at Google who have similar requirements.
To everyone else interested in AIO extensions: I'd love to hear your ideas.
> Do you have time to put in some effort into defining these extensions?
I think so. Let's see how much we can get done.
--D
>
> -ben
>
> > It's a much cleaner way to extend the interface without an explosion of
> > command enums that are really combinations of per-io arguments that are
> > present or not.
> >
> > And heck, on the sync rw syscall side, add variant that have a pointer
> > to this same extension struct. There's nothing inherently aio specific
> > about having lots more per-io inputs and outputs.
> >
> > - z
>
> --
> "Thought is the essence of where you are now."
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>