A bit of addition. On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 01:23:57PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote: > This patchset provides a solution to a real-world problem that is not > solved with any other patchset. I expect it to be reviewed as any other > patchset, it's not an "RFC" from my perspective: it's a proposal for > inclusion. Don't worry, Andrew is not going to apply anything > accidentally. I can't force it down your throat but I feel somewhat uneasy about how this was posted without any reference to the previous discussion as if this were just now being proposed especially as the said discussion wasn't particularly favorable to this approach. Prefixing RFC or at least pointing back to the original discussion seems like the courteous thing to do. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>