On Fri, 28 Feb 2014, Ning Qu wrote:
> In shmem/tmpfs, we also use the generic filemap_map_pages,
> seems the additional checking is not worth a separate version
> of map_pages for it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ning Qu <quning@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/shmem.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
> index 1f18c9d..2ea4e89 100644
> --- a/mm/shmem.c
> +++ b/mm/shmem.c
> @@ -2783,6 +2783,7 @@ static const struct super_operations shmem_ops = {
>
> static const struct vm_operations_struct shmem_vm_ops = {
> .fault = shmem_fault,
> + .map_pages = filemap_map_pages,
> #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> .set_policy = shmem_set_policy,
> .get_policy = shmem_get_policy,
> --
(There's no need for a 0/1, all the info should go into the one patch.)
I expect this will prove to be a very sensible and adequate patch,
thank you: it probably wouldn't be worth more effort to give shmem
anything special of its own, and filemap_map_pages() is already
(almost) coping with exceptional entries.
But I can't Ack it until I've tested it some more, won't be able to
do so until Sunday; and even then some doubt, since this and Kirill's
are built upon mmotm/next, which after a while gives me spinlock
lockups under load these days, yet to be investigated.
"almost" above because, Kirill, even without Ning's extension to
shmem, your filemap_map_page() soon crashes on an exceptional entry:
Don't try to dereference an exceptional entry.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
--- mmotm+kirill/mm/filemap.c 2014-02-28 15:17:50.984019060 -0800
+++ linux/mm/filemap.c 2014-02-28 16:38:04.976633308 -0800
@@ -2084,7 +2084,7 @@ repeat:
if (radix_tree_deref_retry(page))
break;
else
- goto next;
+ continue;
}
if (!page_cache_get_speculative(page))
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>