On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 23:39:37 -0500 Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > vma_adjust() is called also for vma(VM_HUGETLB) and it could happen that > we happen to try to split hugetlbfs hugepage. So exclude the possibility. > It would be nice to have a more complete changelog here please. Under what circumstances does this cause problems and what are the user-observable effects? > --- next-20140220.orig/mm/mmap.c > +++ next-20140220/mm/mmap.c > @@ -772,7 +772,8 @@ again: remove_next = 1 + (end > next->vm_end); > } > } > > - vma_adjust_trans_huge(vma, start, end, adjust_next); > + if (transparent_hugepage_enabled(vma)) > + vma_adjust_trans_huge(vma, start, end, adjust_next); > > anon_vma = vma->anon_vma; > if (!anon_vma && adjust_next) > -- > 1.8.5.3 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>