On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> - clear all the cache entries (of the new 'struct task_struct'! - so
> not in dup_mmap, but make sure it's zeroed when allocating!)(
>
> - set vmcache_seqnum to 0 in dup_mmap (since any sequence number is
> fine when it got invalidated, and 0 is best for "avoid overflow").
Btw, as far as I can tell, that also makes the per-thread vmacache
automatically do the right thing for the non-MMU case, so that you
could just remove the difference between CONFIG_MMU and NOMMU.
Basically, dup_mmap() should no longer have anything to do with the
vmacache, since it is now per-thread, not per-mm.
So :
- allocating a new "struct mm_struct" should clear the
vmacache_seqnum for that new mm, to try to minimize unnecessary future
overflow.
- thread allocation should just zero the cache entries, and set
"tsk->vmacache_seqnum = mm->vmacache_seqnum" (after dup_mm()) to avoid
future unnecessary flushes.
and as far as I can tell, the logic would be exactly the same on NOMMU
(the dup_mm just doesn't happen, since all forks are basically sharing
mm).
And maybe you'd want to make VMACACHE_SIZE be 1 on NOMMU (and make
sure to change the "& 3" to "& (VMACACHE_SIZE-1)". Just to keep the
size down on small systems that really don't need it.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>