Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] topology: support node_numa_mem() for determining the fallback node

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 18 Feb 2014, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:

> We use the topology provided by the hypervisor, it does actually reflect
> where CPUs and memory are, and their corresponding performance/NUMA
> characteristics.

And so there are actually nodes without memory that have processors?
Can the hypervisor or the linux arch code be convinced to ignore nodes
without memory or assign a sane default node to processors?

> > Ok then also move the memory of the local node somewhere?
>
> This happens below the OS, we don't control the hypervisor's decisions.
> I'm not sure if that's what you are suggesting.

You could also do this from the powerpc arch code by sanitizing the
processor / node information that is then used by Linux.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]