On Wed, 5 Feb 2014, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > Right so if we are ignoring the node then the simplest thing to do is to > > not deactivate the current cpu slab but to take an object from it. > > Ok, that's what Anton's patch does, I believe. Are you ok with that > patch as it is? No. Again his patch only works if the node is memoryless not if there are other issues that prevent allocation from that node. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>