Re: [patch for-3.14] mm, mempolicy: fix mempolicy printing in numa_maps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 27 Jan 2014, Mel Gorman wrote:

> > Should we also consider printing the MOF and MORON states so we get a
> > better view of what the actual policy is?
> > 
> 
> MOF and MORON are separate issues because MOF is exposed to the userspace
> API but not the policies that make up MORON. For MORON, I concluded that
> we should not expose that via numa_maps unless it can be controlled from
> userspace.
> 

We print the possible flags for set_mempolicy() which is pretty simple 
since there's only one possible flag at any given time, but we don't print 
any possible flags for mbind().  If we are to start printing lazy 
migrate-on-fault then we should probably print the other flags as well, I 
just don't know how long we want lines in numa_maps to be.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]