On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 05:46:28PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > +In order to support this method, the storage must be byte-accessable by > > byte-accessible Thanks. Fixed. > > +- ensuring that there is sufficient locking between reads, writes, > > + truncates and page faults > > truncates, and > but that's up to you and your editor/proofreader etc. :) Ooh, do we really get to have a discussion about the Oxford Comma on linux-kernel? :-) I haven't actually run this material past my editor (who is my wife, so I need really convincing arguments to do it your way instead of hers), but funnily we had a conversation about the Oxford Comma while on holiday last week. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_comma has a reasonably exhaustive discourse on the subject, and I learned that she's probably primarily against it because of her journalism degree. > > +Even if the kernel or its modules are stored on an filesystem that supports > > a Good catch. I think I started out with 'an fs', then expanded it to "an filesystem" which of course is nonsense. -- Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step." -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>