On Mon 13-01-14 17:54:04, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> It is surprising that the mem_cgroup iterator can return memcgs which
> have not yet been fully initialized. By accident (or trial and error?)
> this appears not to present an actual problem; but it may be better to
> prevent such surprises, by skipping memcgs not yet online.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
This makes a perfect sense now after Tejun pointed out that I was wrong
assuming css_online is called before cgroup is made visible.
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> Decide for yourself whether to take this or not. I spent quite a while
> digging into a mysterious "trying to register non-static key" issue from
> lockdep, which originated from the iterator returning a vmalloc'ed memcg
> a moment before the res_counter_init()s had done their spin_lock_init()s.
> But the backtrace was an odd one of our own mis-devising, not a charge or
> reclaim or stats trace, so probably it's never been a problem for vanilla.
>
> mm/memcontrol.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> --- mmotm/mm/memcontrol.c 2014-01-10 18:25:02.236448954 -0800
> +++ linux/mm/memcontrol.c 2014-01-12 22:21:10.700570471 -0800
> @@ -1119,10 +1119,8 @@ skip_node:
> * protected by css_get and the tree walk is rcu safe.
> */
> if (next_css) {
> - struct mem_cgroup *mem = mem_cgroup_from_css(next_css);
> -
> - if (css_tryget(&mem->css))
> - return mem;
> + if ((next_css->flags & CSS_ONLINE) && css_tryget(next_css))
> + return mem_cgroup_from_css(next_css);
> else {
> prev_css = next_css;
> goto skip_node;
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>