On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 16:36:33 +0400 Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > When direct reclaim is executed by a process bound to a set of NUMA > nodes, we should scan only those nodes when possible, but currently we > will scan kmem from all online nodes even if the kmem shrinker is NUMA > aware. That said, binding a process to a particular NUMA node won't > prevent it from shrinking inode/dentry caches from other nodes, which is > not good. Fix this. Seems right. I worry that reducing the amount of shrinking which node-bound processes perform might affect workloads in unexpected ways. I think I'll save this one for 3.15-rc1, OK? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>