Re: [PATCH 2/5] x86: mm: Clean up inconsistencies when flushing TLB ranges

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/09/2014 09:34 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
NR_TLB_LOCAL_FLUSH_ALL is not always accounted for correctly and the
comparison with total_vm is done before taking tlb_flushall_shift into
account. Clean it up.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]