Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fix ebizzy performance regression due to X86 TLB range flush v2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Thanks again for going through all this. Tracking multi-commit 
> > performance regressions across 1.5 years worth of commits is 
> > generally very hard. Does your testing effort comes from 
> > enterprise Linux QA testing, or did you ran into this problem 
> > accidentally?
> 
> It does not come from enterprise Linux QA testing but it's motivated 
> by it. I want to catch as many "obvious" performance bugs before 
> they do as it saves time and stress in the long run. To assist that, 
> I setup continual performance regression testing and ebizzy was 
> included in the first report I opened. [...]

Neat!

> [...]  It makes me worry what the rest of the reports contain.

It will be full with reports of phenomenal speedups!

Thanks,

	Ingo

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]