Re: [PATCH] mm/memory-failure.c: send action optional signal to an arbitrary thread

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I'm not sure if I understand.  "letting the main thread create a dedicated
> thread for error handling" is exactly what I was trying to do -- the
> problem is that SIGBUS(BUS_MCEERR_AO) signals are never sent to that
> thread, which is contrary to common expectations.  


Yes handling AO errors like this was the intended way 

I thought I had tested it at some point and intentionally changed the 
signal checking for this case (because normally SIGBUS cannot be
blocked). Anyways if it doesn't work it's definitely a bug.

If you fix it please make sure to add the test case to mce-test.

-Andi

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]