Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] Configurable fair allocation zone policy v2r6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 13.12.2013 15:10, Mel Gorman wrote:
Kicked this another bit today. It's still a bit half-baked but it restores
the historical performance and leaves the door open at the end for playing
nice with distributing file pages between nodes. Finishing this series
depends on whether we are going to make the remote node behaviour of the
fair zone allocation policy configurable or redefine MPOL_LOCAL. I'm in
favour of the configurable option because the default can be redefined and
tested while giving users a "compat" mode if we discover the new default
behaviour sucks for some workload.


I'll start a 5-day test of this patchset in a few hours, unless you can send an updated one in the meantime. I intend to test it on a rather boring 4GB x86_64 machine that before Johannes' work had lots of trouble balancing zones. Would you recommend to use the default settings, i.e. don't mess with tunables at this point?

Regards,
--
Zlatko

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]