On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 03:25:07PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 02:10:03PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > zone_local is using node_distance which is a more expensive call than
> > necessary. On x86, it's another function call in the allocator fast path
> > and increases cache footprint. This patch makes the assumption zones on a
> > local node will share the same node ID. The necessary information should
> > already be cache hot.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > mm/page_alloc.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > index 64020eb..fd9677e 100644
> > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > @@ -1816,7 +1816,7 @@ static void zlc_clear_zones_full(struct zonelist *zonelist)
> >
> > static bool zone_local(struct zone *local_zone, struct zone *zone)
> > {
> > - return node_distance(local_zone->node, zone->node) == LOCAL_DISTANCE;
> > + return zone_to_nid(zone) == numa_node_id();
>
> Why numa_node_id()? We pass in the preferred zone as @local_zone:
>
Initially because I was thinking "local node" and numa_node_id() is a
per-cpu variable that should be cheap to access and in some cases
cache-hot as the top-level gfp API calls numa_node_id().
Thinking about it more though it still makes sense because the preferred
zone is not necessarily local. If the allocation request requires ZONE_DMA32
and the local node does not have that zone then preferred zone is on a
remote node.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>