I need to move this up a bit, and I am doing in a separate patch just to
reduce churn in the patch that needs it.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 3a4e2f8..220b463 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -2983,6 +2983,21 @@ static int memcg_cache_idx(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
return ret;
}
+static size_t memcg_caches_array_size(int num_groups)
+{
+ ssize_t size;
+ if (num_groups <= 0)
+ return 0;
+
+ size = 2 * num_groups;
+ if (size < MEMCG_CACHES_MIN_SIZE)
+ size = MEMCG_CACHES_MIN_SIZE;
+ else if (size > MEMCG_CACHES_MAX_SIZE)
+ size = MEMCG_CACHES_MAX_SIZE;
+
+ return size;
+}
+
/*
* This is a bit cumbersome, but it is rarely used and avoids a backpointer
* in the memcg_cache_params struct.
@@ -3125,21 +3140,6 @@ int memcg_update_cache_sizes(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
return 0;
}
-static size_t memcg_caches_array_size(int num_groups)
-{
- ssize_t size;
- if (num_groups <= 0)
- return 0;
-
- size = 2 * num_groups;
- if (size < MEMCG_CACHES_MIN_SIZE)
- size = MEMCG_CACHES_MIN_SIZE;
- else if (size > MEMCG_CACHES_MAX_SIZE)
- size = MEMCG_CACHES_MAX_SIZE;
-
- return size;
-}
-
/*
* We should update the current array size iff all caches updates succeed. This
* can only be done from the slab side. The slab mutex needs to be held when
--
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>