I sent out 3 patches on 12/2/2013. I didn't get any response. I thought I added the right people based on get_maintainers script. Can anyone comment on these or point me in the right direction? RGB, Can you at least ACK the audit subsystem patch " audit: Audit proc cmdline value"? Thank you, Bill -----Original Message----- From: owner-linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of William Roberts Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 1:11 PM To: linux-audit@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; rgb@xxxxxxxxxx; viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [PATCH] - auditing cmdline This patch series relates to work started on the audit mailing list. It eventually involved touching other modules, so I am trying to pull in those owners as well. In a nutshell I add new utility functions for accessing a processes cmdline value as displayed in proc/<self>/cmdline, and then refactor procfs to use the utility functions, and then add the ability to the audit subsystem to record this value. Thanks for any feedback and help. [PATCH 1/3] mm: Create utility functions for accessing a tasks [PATCH 2/3] proc: Update get proc_pid_cmdline() to use mm.h helpers [PATCH 3/3] audit: Audit proc cmdline value -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a> -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href