Re: [PATCH -V2 3/5] mm: Move change_prot_numa outside CONFIG_ARCH_USES_NUMA_PROT_NONE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/05/2013 12:20 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 10:48 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:

Ok, I can move the changes below #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING ? We call
change_prot_numa from task_numa_work and queue_pages_range(). The later
may be an issue. So doing the below will help ?

-#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_USES_NUMA_PROT_NONE
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING

I will defer to Mel and Rik (should we also CC Andrea ?)

It looks like manual numa binding can also use lazy
page migration, but I am not sure if that can happen
without CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING, or if mbind always uses
MPOL_MF_STRICT...

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]