Re: [PATCH RFC] mm readahead: Fix the readahead fail in case of empty numa node

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 04 Dec 2013 14:00:09 +0530 Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > I don't recall the rationale for the current code and of course we
> > didn't document it.  It might be in the changelogs somewhere - could
> > you please do the git digging and see if you can find out?
> 
> Unfaortunately, from my search, I saw that the code belonged to pre git
> time, so could not get much information on that.

Here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2004/8/20/242

It seems it was done as a rather thoughtless performance optimisation. 
I'd say it's time to reimplement max_sane_readahead() from scratch.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]