On Wed, 27 Nov 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:45:17AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Nov 2013, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 02:11:57PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > > > Ping? I still see this warning.
> > >
> > > Did your test include patch 0c3c6c00c6?
> >
> > And how is that patch supposed to help?
> >
> > > > >[ 418.312449] WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 4178 at lib/debugobjects.c:260 debug_print_object+0x8d/0xb0()
> > > > >[ 418.313243] ODEBUG: free active (active state 0) object type: timer_list hint:
> > > > >delayed_work_timer_fn+0x0/0x20
> >
> > > > >[ 418.321101] [<ffffffff812874d7>] kmem_cache_free+0x197/0x340
> > > > >[ 418.321101] [<ffffffff81249e76>] kmem_cache_destroy+0x86/0xe0
> > > > >[ 418.321101] [<ffffffff83d5d681>] nf_conntrack_cleanup_net_list+0x131/0x170
> >
> > The debug code detects an active timer, which itself is part of a
> > delayed work struct. The call comes from kmem_cache_destroy().
> >
> > kmem_cache_free(kmem_cache, s);
> >
> > So debug object says: s contains an active timer. s is the kmem_cache
> > which is destroyed from nf_conntrack_cleanup_net_list.
> >
> > Now struct kmem_cache has in case of SLUB:
> >
> > struct kobject kobj; /* For sysfs */
> >
> > and struct kobject has:
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE
> > struct delayed_work release;
> > #endif
> >
> > So this is the thing you want to look at:
> >
> > commit c817a67ec (kobject: delayed kobject release: help find buggy
> > drivers) added that delayed work thing.
> >
> > I fear that does not work for kobjects which are embedded into
> > something else.
>
> No, kobjects embedded into something else have their lifetime determined
> by the embedded kobject. That's rule #1 of kobjects - or rather reference
> counted objects.
>
> The point at which the kobject gets destructed is when the release function
> is called. If it is destructed before that time, that's a violation of
> the reference counted nature of kobjects, and that's what the delay on
> releasing is designed to catch.
>
> It's designed to catch code which does this exact path:
>
> put(obj)
> free(obj)
>
> rather than code which does it the right way:
>
> put(obj)
> -> refcount becomes 0
> -> release function gets called
> ->free(obj)
>
> The former is unsafe because obj may have other references.
Though the kobject is the only thing which has a delayed work embedded
inside struct kmem_cache. And the debug object splat points at the
kmem_cache_free() of the struct kmem_cache itself. That's why I
assumed the wreckage around that place. And indeed:
kmem_cache_destroy(s)
__kmem_cache_shutdown(s)
sysfs_slab_remove(s)
....
kobject_put(&s->kobj)
kref_put(&kobj->kref, kobject_release);
kobject_release(kref)
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE
schedule_delayed_work(&kobj->release)
#else
kobject_cleanup(kobj)
#endif
So in the CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE=y case, schedule_delayed_work()
_IS_ called which arms the timer. debugobjects catches the attempt to
free struct kmem_cache which contains the armed timer.
So much for rule #1
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>