Re: Setting stack NUMA policy?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm trying to arrange for a process to have a different memory policy
> on its stack as compared to everything else (e.g. mapped libraries).
> Before I start looking for kludges, is there any clean way to do this?
>
> So far, the best I can come up with is to either parse /proc/self/maps
> on startup or to deduce the stack range from the stack pointer and
> then call mbind.  Then, for added fun, I'll need to hook mmap so that
> I can mbind MAP_STACK vmas that are created for threads.
>
> This is awful.  Is there something better?
>
> (What I really want is a separate policy for MAP_SHARED vs MAP_PRIVATE.)

After a bit more thought, I think that what I *really* want is for the
stack for a thread that has affinity for a single NUMA node to
automatically end up on that node.  This seems like a straightforward
win if it's implementable.

--Andy

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]