Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] MCS Lock: Barrier corrections

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 08:53:33PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> The other option is to weaken lock semantics so that unlock-lock no
> longer implies a full barrier, but I believe that we would regret taking
> that path.  (It would be OK by me, I would just add a few smp_mb()
> calls on various slowpaths in RCU.  But...)

Please no, I know we rely on it in a number of places, I just can't
remember where all those were :/

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]