Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] MCS Lock: Barrier corrections

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I don't necessarily mind the factoring out, I just think it needs to be 
> really solid and clear if - and *before* - we do this. [...]

Okay, agreed.

> [...] We do *not* want to factor out some half-arsed implementation and 
> then have later patches to fix up the crud. Nor when multiple different 
> locks then use that common code.
> 
> So I think it needs to be *clearly* great code before it gets factored 
> out. Because before it is great code, it should not be shared with 
> anything else.

Ok, we'll go through it with a fine comb and I won't rush merging it.

Thanks,

	Ingo

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]