* Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > But success primarily depends on how useful the tooling UI turns out > > to be: create a nice Slang or GTK UI for kprobes and triggers, and/or > > turn it into a really intuitive command line UI, and people will use > > it. > > > > I think annotated assembly/source output is a really nice match for > > triggers and kprobes, so I'd suggest the Slang TUI route ... > > yep, current toggling command line UI is not much user friendly > > but perhaps we should leave it there (because it seems it wont get much > better anyway) and focus more on Slang UI as the target one.. > > CCing Arnaldo ;-) Btw., I think we should do the TUI interface _before_ we can merge the kernel changes. Frankly, 'not very user friendly' means that it's not used (and tested) much - which begs the question: why merge the feature at all? Making a new kernel feature usable to as many people as possible must be a primary concern, not an afterthought. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>