Re: BUG: mm, numa: test segfaults, only when NUMA balancing is on

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 02:58:28PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:54:29AM -0500, Alex Thorlton wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> > 
> > I ran into a bug a week or so ago, that I believe has something to do
> > with NUMA balancing, but I'm having a tough time tracking down exactly
> > what is causing it.  When running with the following configuration
> > options set:
> > 
> 
> Can you test with patches
> cd65718712469ad844467250e8fad20a5838baae..0255d491848032f6c601b6410c3b8ebded3a37b1
> applied? They fix some known memory corruption problems, were merged for
> 3.12 (so alternatively just test 3.12) and have been tagged for -stable.

I just finished testing with 3.12, and I'm still seeing the same issue.
This is actually a bit strange to me, because, when I tested with
3.12-rc5 a while back, everything seemed to be ok (see previoues e-mail
in this thread, to Bob Liu).  I guess, embarrasingly enough, I must have
been playing with a screwed up config that day, and managed to somehow
avoid the problem...  Either way, it appears that we still have a
problem here.

I'll poke around a bit more on this in the next few days and see if I
can come up with any more information.  In the meantime, let me know if
you have any other suggestions.

Thanks,

- Alex

> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -- 
> Mel Gorman
> SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]