On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 07:22:55 -0400 Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We probably want to cc stable for this and the next one. How should > these be routed? I can take these through percpu tree or mm works > too. Either way, it'd be best to route them together. Yes, all three look like -stable material to me. I'll grab them later in the week if you haven't ;) The names of the first two patches distress me. They rather clearly assert that the code affects percpu_counter.[ch], but that is not the case. Massaging is needed to fix that up. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>