From: Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxx>
I need to move this up a bit, and I am doing it in a separate patch just to
reduce churn in the patch that needs it.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 5104d1f..bb38596 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -2987,6 +2987,37 @@ static struct kmem_cache *memcg_params_to_cache(struct memcg_cache_params *p)
return cachep->memcg_params->memcg_caches[memcg_cache_idx(p->memcg)];
}
+/*
+ * During the creation a new cache, we need to disable our accounting mechanism
+ * altogether. This is true even if we are not creating, but rather just
+ * enqueing new caches to be created.
+ *
+ * This is because that process will trigger allocations; some visible, like
+ * explicit kmallocs to auxiliary data structures, name strings and internal
+ * cache structures; some well concealed, like INIT_WORK() that can allocate
+ * objects during debug.
+ *
+ * If any allocation happens during memcg_kmem_get_cache, we will recurse back
+ * to it. This may not be a bounded recursion: since the first cache creation
+ * failed to complete (waiting on the allocation), we'll just try to create the
+ * cache again, failing at the same point.
+ *
+ * memcg_kmem_get_cache is prepared to abort after seeing a positive count of
+ * memcg_kmem_skip_account. So we enclose anything that might allocate memory
+ * inside the following two functions.
+ */
+static inline void memcg_stop_kmem_account(void)
+{
+ VM_BUG_ON(!current->mm);
+ current->memcg_kmem_skip_account++;
+}
+
+static inline void memcg_resume_kmem_account(void)
+{
+ VM_BUG_ON(!current->mm);
+ current->memcg_kmem_skip_account--;
+}
+
#ifdef CONFIG_SLABINFO
static int mem_cgroup_slabinfo_read(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css,
struct cftype *cft, struct seq_file *m)
@@ -3262,37 +3293,6 @@ out:
kfree(s->memcg_params);
}
-/*
- * During the creation a new cache, we need to disable our accounting mechanism
- * altogether. This is true even if we are not creating, but rather just
- * enqueing new caches to be created.
- *
- * This is because that process will trigger allocations; some visible, like
- * explicit kmallocs to auxiliary data structures, name strings and internal
- * cache structures; some well concealed, like INIT_WORK() that can allocate
- * objects during debug.
- *
- * If any allocation happens during memcg_kmem_get_cache, we will recurse back
- * to it. This may not be a bounded recursion: since the first cache creation
- * failed to complete (waiting on the allocation), we'll just try to create the
- * cache again, failing at the same point.
- *
- * memcg_kmem_get_cache is prepared to abort after seeing a positive count of
- * memcg_kmem_skip_account. So we enclose anything that might allocate memory
- * inside the following two functions.
- */
-static inline void memcg_stop_kmem_account(void)
-{
- VM_BUG_ON(!current->mm);
- current->memcg_kmem_skip_account++;
-}
-
-static inline void memcg_resume_kmem_account(void)
-{
- VM_BUG_ON(!current->mm);
- current->memcg_kmem_skip_account--;
-}
-
static void kmem_cache_destroy_work_func(struct work_struct *w)
{
struct kmem_cache *cachep;
--
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>