On Thu, 17 Oct 2013, Pekka Enberg wrote: > On 10/16/13 10:34 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 17:43:57 +0900 Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > > > There is two main topics in this patchset. One is to reduce memory usage > > > and the other is to change a management method of free objects of a slab. > > > > > > The SLAB allocate a struct slab for each slab. The size of this structure > > > except bufctl array is 40 bytes on 64 bits machine. We can reduce memory > > > waste and cache footprint if we overload struct slab over struct page. > > Seems a good idea from a quick look. > > Indeed. > > Christoph, I'd like to pick this up and queue for linux-next. Any > objections or comments to the patches? I think this is fine. I have looked through the whole set repeatedly and like the overall approach but I have I have only commented in detail on a the beginning part of it. There was always something coming up. Sigh. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>