Re: [RFC 07/23] mm/memblock: debug: correct displaying of upper memory boundary

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 05:58:50PM -0400, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx>
> 
> When debugging is enabled (cmdline has "memblock=debug") the memblock
> will display upper memory boundary per each allocated/freed memory range
> wrongly. For example:
>  memblock_reserve: [0x0000009e7e8000-0x0000009e7ed000] _memblock_early_alloc_try_nid_nopanic+0xfc/0x12c
> 
> The 0x0000009e7ed000 is displayed instead of 0x0000009e7ecfff
> 
> Hence, correct this by changing formula used to calculate upper memory
> boundary to (u64)base + size - 1 instead of  (u64)base + size everywhere
> in the debug messages.

I kinda prefer base + size because it's easier to actually know the
size but yeah, it should have been [base, base + size) and other
places use base + size - 1 notation so it probably is better to stick
to that.  Maybe move this one to the beginning of the series?

Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]