On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 06:49:30PM +0200, Toralf Förster wrote:
> On 10/10/2013 12:33 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > Am 09.10.2013 23:47, schrieb Jan Kara:
> >> On Wed 09-10-13 20:43:50, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >>> CC'ing mm folks.
> >>> Please see below.
> >> Added Fenguang to CC since he is the author of this code.
> >
> > Thx, get_maintainer.pl didn't list him.
> >
> >>> Am 09.10.2013 19:26, schrieb Toralf Förster:
> >>>> On 10/08/2013 10:07 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >>>>> On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>>>> Hmm, now pages_dirtied is zero, according to the backtrace, but the BUG_ON()
> >>>>>>> asserts its strict positive?!?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Can you please try the following instead of the BUG_ON():
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> if (pause < 0) {
> >>>>>>> printk("pages_dirtied = %lu\n", pages_dirtied);
> >>>>>>> printk("task_ratelimit = %lu\n", task_ratelimit);
> >>>>>>> printk("pause = %ld\n", pause);
> >>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Geert
> >>>>>> I tried it in different ways already - I'm completely unsuccessful in getting any printk output.
> >>>>>> As soon as the issue happens I do have a
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 22s! [trinity-child0:1521]
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> at stderr of the UML and then no further input is accepted. With uml_mconsole I'm however able
> >>>>>> to run very basic commands like a crash dump, sysrq ond so on.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You may get an idea of the magnitude of pages_dirtied by using a chain of
> >>>>> BUG_ON()s, like:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> BUG_ON(pages_dirtied > 2000000000);
> >>>>> BUG_ON(pages_dirtied > 1000000000);
> >>>>> BUG_ON(pages_dirtied > 100000000);
> >>>>> BUG_ON(pages_dirtied > 10000000);
> >>>>> BUG_ON(pages_dirtied > 1000000);
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Probably 1 million is already too much for normal operation?
> >>>>>
> >>>> period = HZ * pages_dirtied / task_ratelimit;
> >>>> BUG_ON(pages_dirtied > 2000000000);
> >>>> BUG_ON(pages_dirtied > 1000000000); <-------------- this is line 1467
> >>>
> >>> Summary for mm people:
> >>>
> >>> Toralf runs trinty on UML/i386.
> >>> After some time pages_dirtied becomes very large.
> >>> More than 1000000000 pages in this case.
> >> Huh, this is really strange. pages_dirtied is passed into
> >> balance_dirty_pages() from current->nr_dirtied. So I wonder how a value
> >> over 10^9 can get there. After all that is over 4TB so I somewhat doubt the
> >> task was ever able to dirty that much during its lifetime (but correct me
> >> if I'm wrong here, with UML and memory backed disks it is not totally
> >> impossible)... I went through the logic of handling ->nr_dirtied but
> >> I didn't find any obvious problem there. Hum, maybe one thing - what
> >> 'task_ratelimit' values do you see in balance_dirty_pages? If that one was
> >> huge, we could possibly accumulate huge current->nr_dirtied.
> >
> > Toralf, you can try a snipplet like this one to get the values printed out:
> > diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
> > index f5236f8..a80e520 100644
> > --- a/mm/page-writeback.c
> > +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
> > @@ -1463,6 +1463,12 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
> > goto pause;
> > }
> > period = HZ * pages_dirtied / task_ratelimit;
> > +
> > + {
> > + extern int printf(char *, ...);
> > + printf("---> task_ratelimit: %lu\n", task_ratelimit);
> > + }
> > +
> > pause = period;
> > if (current->dirty_paused_when)
> > pause -= now - current->dirty_paused_when;
> >
> >
> > Yes, printf(), not printk().
> > Using this hack we print directly to host's stdout. :)
> >
> *head smack* ofc - works fine.
> So given this diff :
>
> iff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
> index f5236f8..5a2c337 100644
> --- a/mm/page-writeback.c
> +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
> @@ -1464,6 +1464,13 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
> }
> period = HZ * pages_dirtied / task_ratelimit;
> pause = period;
> + if (pause < 0) {
> + extern int printf(char *, ...);
> + printf("overflow : pause : %li\n", pause);
> + printf("overflow : pages_dirtied : %lu\n", pages_dirtied);
> + printf("overflow : task_ratelimit: %lu\n", task_ratelimit);
> + BUG_ON(1);
> + }
> if (current->dirty_paused_when)
> pause -= now - current->dirty_paused_when;
> /*
> @@ -1503,6 +1510,13 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
> }
>
> pause:
> + if (pause < 0) {
Oops, we got
ick : pause : -984
here! Since pause is bounded by [min_pause, max_pause], it means
something goes wrong with the bounds. Would you help print min_pause
and max_pause as well?
It seems there are "long <=> unsigned long" conversion problems in
bdi_max_pause(), which might make max_pause a negative number. And the
min_pause calculation is based on max_pause to some degree..
Thanks,
Fengguang
> + extern int printf(char *, ...);
> + printf("ick : pause : %li\n", pause);
> + printf("ick: pages_dirtied : %lu\n", pages_dirtied);
> + printf("ick: task_ratelimit: %lu\n", task_ratelimit);
> + BUG_ON(1);
> + }
> trace_balance_dirty_pages(bdi,
> dirty_thresh,
> background_thresh,
>
>
> I got this :
>
>
>
>
> * Starting local
> net.core.warnings = 0 [ ok ]
> ick : pause : -984
> ick: pages_dirtied : 0
> ick: task_ratelimit: 0
> Kernel panic - not syncing: BUG!
> CPU: 0 PID: 1434 Comm: trinity-child2 Not tainted 3.12.0-rc4-00029-g0e7a3ed-dirty #12
> 47397c84 47397cb0 0841b5a0 084c30e8 085f76e0 084b4745 47397cbc 00000000
> fffffc28 01fff278 085cb4a0 47397d2c 0841c5a0 084b4745 084c5398 000005ee
> 08432cf0 43e47600 471757f8 47397cf0 ffffff0c 47397cdc 5256d8b9 3417ec18 47397c5c: [<08060b2c>] show_stack+0x7c/0xd0
> 47397c7c: [<0841e34d>] dump_stack+0x26/0x28
> 47397c8c: [<0841b5a0>] panic+0x7a/0x180
> 47397cb4: [<0841c5a0>] balance_dirty_pages.isra.32+0x4e3/0x5ad
> 47397d30: [<080d3595>] balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited+0xf5/0x100
> 47397d44: [<080e4a3f>] __do_fault+0x3cf/0x440
> 47397d9c: [<080e6e0f>] handle_mm_fault+0xef/0x7c0
> 47397dec: [<080e7817>] __get_user_pages+0x227/0x420
> 47397e24: [<080e7ae3>] get_user_pages+0x63/0x70
> 47397e4c: [<08143dc6>] SyS_io_setup+0x3c6/0x760
> 47397eb0: [<08062984>] handle_syscall+0x64/0x80
> 47397ef0: [<08074fb5>] userspace+0x475/0x5f0
> 47397fec: [<0805f750>] fork_handler+0x60/0x70
> 47397ffc: [<00000000>] 0x0
>
>
> EIP: 0073:[<40001282>] CPU: 0 Not tainted ESP: 007b:bfb348f8 EFLAGS: 00000246
> Not tainted
> EAX: ffffffda EBX: 00001000 ECX: 080d0000 EDX: 80000048
> ESI: 80fbff1f EDI: ffe02f77 EBP: 90f6e2a3 DS: 007b ES: 007b
> 47397c0c: [<0807947f>] show_regs+0x10f/0x120
> 47397c28: [<080623a9>] panic_exit+0x29/0x50
> 47397c38: [<0809ba86>] notifier_call_chain+0x36/0x60
> 47397c60: [<0809bba1>] __atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x21/0x30
> 47397c70: [<0809bbdf>] atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x2f/0x40
> 47397c8c: [<0841b5bc>] panic+0x96/0x180
> 47397cb4: [<0841c5a0>] balance_dirty_pages.isra.32+0x4e3/0x5ad
> 47397d30: [<080d3595>] balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited+0xf5/0x100
> 47397d44: [<080e4a3f>] __do_fault+0x3cf/0x440
> 47397d9c: [<080e6e0f>] handle_mm_fault+0xef/0x7c0
> 47397dec: [<080e7817>] __get_user_pages+0x227/0x420
> 47397e24: [<080e7ae3>] get_user_pages+0x63/0x70
> 47397e4c: [<08143dc6>] SyS_io_setup+0x3c6/0x760
> 47397eb0: [<08062984>] handle_syscall+0x64/0x80
> 47397ef0: [<08074fb5>] userspace+0x475/0x5f0
> 47397fec: [<0805f750>] fork_handler+0x60/0x70
> 47397ffc: [<00000000>] 0x0
>
> /home/tfoerste/workspace/bin/start_uml.sh: line 115: 18718 Aborted (core dumped) $LINUX earlyprintk ubda=$ROOTFS ubdb=$SWAP eth0=$NET mem=$MEM $TTY umid=uml_$NAME rootfstype=ext4 "$ARGS"
>
>
> >From what I see there are 2 different types of issues - and this is an example of the other of both
>
> > Thanks,
> > //richard
> >
>
>
> --
> MfG/Sincerely
> Toralf Förster
> pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A E508 7DB6 9DA3
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>