On 10/07/2013 06:28 AM, Mel Gorman wrote: > From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Avoiding marking PTEs pte_numa because a particular NUMA node is migrate rate > limited sees like a bad idea. Even if this node can't migrate anymore other > nodes might and we want up-to-date information to do balance decisions. > We already rate limit the actual migrations, this should leave enough > bandwidth to allow the non-migrating scanning. I think its important we > keep up-to-date information if we're going to do placement based on it. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx> -- All rights reversed -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>