Scan delay logic and resets are currently initialised to start scanning
immediately instead of delaying properly. Initialise them properly at
fork time and catch when a new mm has been allocated.
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 4 ++--
kernel/sched/fair.c | 7 +++++++
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 2f3420c..681945e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1619,8 +1619,8 @@ static void __sched_fork(struct task_struct *p)
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
if (p->mm && atomic_read(&p->mm->mm_users) == 1) {
- p->mm->numa_next_scan = jiffies;
- p->mm->numa_next_reset = jiffies;
+ p->mm->numa_next_scan = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_delay);
+ p->mm->numa_next_reset = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_period_reset);
p->mm->numa_scan_seq = 0;
}
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 148838c..22c0c7c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -900,6 +900,13 @@ void task_numa_work(struct callback_head *work)
if (p->flags & PF_EXITING)
return;
+ if (!mm->numa_next_reset || !mm->numa_next_scan) {
+ mm->numa_next_scan = now +
+ msecs_to_jiffies(sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_delay);
+ mm->numa_next_reset = now +
+ msecs_to_jiffies(sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_period_reset);
+ }
+
/*
* Reset the scan period if enough time has gone by. Objective is that
* scanning will be reduced if pages are properly placed. As tasks
--
1.8.4
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>