On Wed 02-10-13 12:32:33, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > (10/2/13 10:27 AM), Jan Kara wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > mm/process_vm_access.c | 8 ++------ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/mm/process_vm_access.c b/mm/process_vm_access.c > > index fd26d0433509..c1bc47d8ed90 100644 > > --- a/mm/process_vm_access.c > > +++ b/mm/process_vm_access.c > > @@ -64,12 +64,8 @@ static int process_vm_rw_pages(struct task_struct *task, > > *bytes_copied = 0; > > > > /* Get the pages we're interested in */ > > - down_read(&mm->mmap_sem); > > - pages_pinned = get_user_pages(task, mm, pa, > > - nr_pages_to_copy, > > - vm_write, 0, process_pages, NULL); > > - up_read(&mm->mmap_sem); > > - > > + pages_pinned = get_user_pages_unlocked(task, mm, pa, nr_pages_to_copy, > > + vm_write, 0, process_pages); > > if (pages_pinned != nr_pages_to_copy) { > > rc = -EFAULT; > > goto end; > > This is wrong because original code is wrong. In this function, page may > be pointed to anon pages. Then, you should keep to take mmap_sem until > finish to copying. Otherwise concurrent fork() makes nasty COW issue. Hum, can you be more specific? I suppose you are speaking about situation when the remote task we are copying data from/to does fork while process_vm_rw_pages() runs. If we are copying data from remote task, I don't see how COW could cause any problem. If we are copying to remote task and fork happens after get_user_pages() but before copy_to_user() then I can see we might be having some trouble. copy_to_user() would then copy data into both original remote process and its child thus essentially bypassing COW. If the child process manages to COW some of the pages before copy_to_user() happens, it can even see only some of the pages. Is that what you mean? Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>