On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yep. The previous lock holder's smp_wmb() won't keep either the compiler > or the CPU from reordering things for the new lock holder. They could for > example reorder the critical section to precede the node->locked check, > which would be very bad. Paul, Tim, Longman, How would you like the proposed changes below? --- Subject: [PATCH] MCS: optimizations and barrier corrections Delete the node->locked = 1 assignment if the lock is free as it won't be used. Delete the smp_wmb() in mcs_spin_lock() and add a full memory barrier at the end of the mcs_spin_lock() function. As Paul McKenney suggested, "you do need a full memory barrier here in order to ensure that you see the effects of the previous lock holder's critical section." And in the mcs_spin_unlock(), move the memory barrier so that it is before the "ACCESS_ONCE(next->locked) = 1;". Signed-off-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@xxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- include/linux/mcslock.h | 7 +++---- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/mcslock.h b/include/linux/mcslock.h index 20fd3f0..edd57d2 100644 --- a/include/linux/mcslock.h +++ b/include/linux/mcslock.h @@ -26,15 +26,14 @@ void mcs_spin_lock(struct mcs_spin_node **lock, struct mcs_spin_node *node) prev = xchg(lock, node); if (likely(prev == NULL)) { - /* Lock acquired */ - node->locked = 1; + /* Lock acquired. No need to set node->locked since it won't be used */ return; } ACCESS_ONCE(prev->next) = node; - smp_wmb(); /* Wait until the lock holder passes the lock down */ while (!ACCESS_ONCE(node->locked)) arch_mutex_cpu_relax(); + smp_mb(); } static void mcs_spin_unlock(struct mcs_spin_node **lock, struct mcs_spin_node *node) @@ -51,8 +50,8 @@ static void mcs_spin_unlock(struct mcs_spin_node **lock, struct mcs_spin_node *n while (!(next = ACCESS_ONCE(node->next))) arch_mutex_cpu_relax(); } - ACCESS_ONCE(next->locked) = 1; smp_wmb(); + ACCESS_ONCE(next->locked) = 1; } #endif -- 1.7.1 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>