On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 04:37:40PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 15:05:28 +0300 "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > It brings thp support for ramfs, but without mmap() -- it will be posted > > separately. > > We were never going to do this :( > > Has anyone reviewed these patches much yet? There already was a lot of review by various people. This is not the first post, just the latest refactoring. > > Intro > > ----- > > > > The goal of the project is preparing kernel infrastructure to handle huge > > pages in page cache. > > > > To proof that the proposed changes are functional we enable the feature > > for the most simple file system -- ramfs. ramfs is not that useful by > > itself, but it's good pilot project. > > At the very least we should get this done for a real filesystem to see > how intrusive the changes are and to evaluate the performance changes. That would give even larger patches, and people already complain the patchkit is too large. The only good way to handle this is baby steps, and you have to start somewhere. > Sigh. A pox on whoever thought up huge pages. managing 1TB+ of memory in 4K chunks is just insane. The question of larger pages is not "if", but only "when". -Andi -- ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>