Alex Thorlton wrote: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 02:25:31PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > Alex Thorlton noticed that some massivly threaded workloads work poorly, > > if THP enabled. This patchset fixes this by introducing split page table > > lock for PMD tables. hugetlbfs is not covered yet. > > > > This patchset is based on work by Naoya Horiguchi. > > > > Changes: > > v2: > > - reuse CONFIG_SPLIT_PTLOCK_CPUS for PMD split lock; > > - s/huge_pmd_lock/pmd_lock/g; > > - assume pgtable_pmd_page_ctor() can fail; > > - fix format line in task_mem() for VmPTE; > > > > Benchmark (from Alex): ftp://shell.sgi.com/collect/appsx_test/pthread_test.tar.gz > > Run on 4 socket Westmere with 128 GiB of RAM. > > Kirill, > > I'm hitting some performance issues with these patches on our larger > machines (>=128 cores/256 threads). I've managed to livelock larger > systems with one of our tests (I'll publish this one soon), and I'm > actually seeing a performance hit on some of the smaller ones. Does "performance hit" mean performance degradation? > I'm currently collecting some results to show the problems I'm hitting, and > trying to research what's causing the livelock. For now I just wanted to let > you know that I'm seeing some issues. I'll be in touch with more details. Looking forward for more details. Thanks for testing. I'll try to find a bigger machine myself. -- Kirill A. Shutemov -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>