Re: [PATCH] OOM killer: wait for tasks with pending SIGKILL to exit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ping :)

On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 19:06:05 +0400
Sergey Dyasly <dserrg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, 9 Sep 2013 13:07:08 -0700 (PDT)
> David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > >  		/*
> > >  		 * If this task is not being ptraced on exit, then wait for it
> > >  		 * to finish before killing some other task unnecessarily.
> > >  		 */
> > > -		if (!(task->group_leader->ptrace & PT_TRACE_EXIT))
> > > +		if (!(task->group_leader->ptrace & PT_TRACE_EXIT)) {
> > > +			set_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_MEMDIE);
> > 
> > This does not, we do not give access to memory reserves unless the process 
> > needs it to allocate memory.  The task here, which is not current, can 
> > call into the oom killer and be granted memory reserves if necessary.
> 
> True. However, why TIF_MEMDIE is set for PF_EXITING task in oom_kill_process()
> then?
> Also, setting TIF_MEMDIE will avoid direct reclaim and memory allocation should
> be fast if exiting task needs it.
> 
> > > @@ -412,16 +415,6 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *p, gfp_t gfp_mask, int order,
> > >  	static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(oom_rs, DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL,
> > >  					      DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST);
> > >  
> > > -	/*
> > > -	 * If the task is already exiting, don't alarm the sysadmin or kill
> > > -	 * its children or threads, just set TIF_MEMDIE so it can die quickly
> > > -	 */
> > > -	if (p->flags & PF_EXITING) {
> > > -		set_tsk_thread_flag(p, TIF_MEMDIE);
> > > -		put_task_struct(p);
> > > -		return;
> > > -	}
> > 
> > I think you misunderstood the point of this; if a selected process is 
> > already in the exit path then this is simply avoiding dumping oom kill 
> > lines to the kernel log.  We want to keep doing that.
> 
> This happens in oom_kill_process() after victim has been selected by
> select_bad_process(). But there is already PF_EXITING check in
> oom_scan_process_thread() and in this case OOM code won't call oom_kill_process.
> There is only a slight chance that victim will become PF_EXITING between
> scan and kill.
> 
> The only difference is in force_kill flag, and the only case where it's set
> is SysRq. And I think in this case OOM killer messages are a good thing to have
> even when victim is already exiting, instead of just silence.
> 
> -- 
> Sergey Dyasly <dserrg@xxxxxxxxx>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]