Re: [patch 0/7] improve memcg oom killer robustness v2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon 16-09-13 16:01:19, azurIt wrote:
> > CC: "Johannes Weiner" <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David Rientjes" <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>, "KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki" <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "KOSAKI Motohiro" <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, cgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >On Sat 14-09-13 12:48:31, azurIt wrote:
> >[...]
> >> Here is the first occurence, this night between 5:15 and 5:25:
> >>  - this time i kept opened terminal from other server to this problematic one with htop running
> >>  - when server went down i opened it and saw one process of one user running at the top and taking 97% of CPU (cgroup 1304)
> >
> >I guess you do not have a stack trace(s) for that process? That would be
> >extremely helpful.
> 
> I'm afraid it won't be possible as server is completely not responding
> when it happens. Anyway, i don't think it was a fault of one process
> or one user.

You can use sysrq+l via serial console to see tasks hogging the CPU or
sysrq+t to see all the existing tasks.
 
[...]
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]