[PATCH 15/50] sched: numa: Correct adjustment of numa_scan_period

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



numa_scan_period is in milliseconds, not jiffies. Properly placed pages
slow the scanning rate but adding 10 jiffies to numa_scan_period means
that the rate scanning slows depends on HZ which is confusing. Get rid
of the jiffies_to_msec conversion and treat it as ms.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 23fd1f3..29ba117 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ void task_numa_fault(int node, int pages, bool migrated)
 			p->numa_scan_period_max = task_scan_max(p);
 
 		p->numa_scan_period = min(p->numa_scan_period_max,
-			p->numa_scan_period + jiffies_to_msecs(10));
+			p->numa_scan_period + 10);
 	}
 
 	task_numa_placement(p);
-- 
1.8.1.4

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]